The Revoked Power of Attorney That Voids Your Deed
The Scenario That Wrecks Your Title
You acquire a property at foreclosure auction. The deed in the chain appears clean — an elderly owner conveyed to a buyer three years ago using a power of attorney, that buyer defaulted, and now you're holding what should be marketable title. Except the POA was revoked four days before the attorney-in-fact signed the deed. The conveyance was void from the moment pen touched paper. The original owner — or their estate — still holds legal title, and your foreclosure deed transferred nothing.
This isn't theoretical. It happens when grantors revoke powers of attorney through separate instruments that never get recorded in the same county as the property, or when revocation occurs by operation of law and no document exists at all.
How Agency Termination Works Against You
Under the Uniform Power of Attorney Act, adopted in some form by most states, a principal can revoke a POA at any time through written notice to the agent. The revocation is effective immediately upon the agent's receipt — not upon recording. This creates an information asymmetry that title searches cannot resolve.
Consider the mechanics: the original POA was recorded with the county recorder, sitting neatly in the chain of title. The revocation letter was handed to the agent in another state, never recorded anywhere. When the agent signed the deed anyway — whether through ignorance, negligence, or fraud — the conveyance was ultra vires. The agent had no authority. Under basic agency law principles codified in Restatement (Third) of Agency § 3.06, an act by a former agent does not bind the principal once actual authority terminates.
Worse, many states hold that a subsequent bona fide purchaser cannot rely on an unrevoked recorded POA if the revocation occurred before the conveyance. Unlike the shelter rule that protects BFPs in other contexts, agency termination voids the transaction entirely — there's nothing to shelter under.
The Death Problem
Revocation isn't always intentional. Death of the principal terminates a POA automatically unless it's explicitly durable and contains survivorship language — and even durable powers terminate upon death in most jurisdictions. If the principal died on Tuesday and the attorney-in-fact signed the deed on Thursday, the conveyance is void regardless of whether anyone knew about the death.
The Uniform Power of Attorney Act § 110 provides some protection for those who rely on a POA in good faith without knowledge of termination, but this protection typically runs to the agent and third parties dealing directly with the agent — not to subsequent purchasers in the chain. You, buying at foreclosure three years later, get no statutory cover.
Why Your Title Search Missed It
Standard title searches pull recorded documents indexed against the property or the parties in the chain. A revocation letter sitting in someone's filing cabinet doesn't appear. A death certificate filed in another county — or another state — doesn't appear. Even a recorded revocation might not appear if it was indexed only under the principal's name and not cross-indexed against the property.
Title insurance underwriters are supposed to catch this through their examination of the POA itself, requiring proof of validity at the time of execution. But when you're buying at foreclosure, you're often examining a chain that was already insured years ago, relying on prior policy coverage that won't transfer to you. The original underwriter's due diligence doesn't help you now.
What Changes Your Risk Profile
Any property where a POA appears in the chain requires verification beyond the recorded instrument. You need to confirm the principal was alive on the date of execution. You need to search for recorded revocations not just in the property's county but in any county where the principal resided. You need to look for probate filings that would indicate death preceded the conveyance.
When the POA-based deed is more than a few years old and subsequent conveyances occurred, statute of limitations and adverse possession doctrines may provide some protection — but these defenses are fact-intensive and litigation-dependent. The safer approach is identifying the risk before you bid, not after you've wired funds to the trustee.